“OY VEY! DON’T LET IRAN GET CORRUPTED BY WESTERN SOCIETY!”

There is an obscene sickness in the White Western cucks who idolise and fawn over and whore for White-hating fake-“anti-zionist” enemy Negroes, Asians & Kikes and Commies because those White Western cucks are too cowardly and impotent to remove their own ZOG overlords.

The Shah of Iran, shortly before his death:

“I did not know it then – perhaps I did not want to know – but it is clear to me now that the Americans wanted me out. Clearly this is what the human rights advocates in the State Department wanted … What was I to make of the Administration’s sudden decision to call former Under Secretary of State George Ball to the White House as an adviser on Iran? … Ball was among those Americans who wanted to abandon me and ultimately my country.”

[George Ball: Senior managing director Lehman Brothers Kuhn Loeb. Ball was among the first North American members of the Bilderberg Group, attending every meeting except for one before his death. He was a member of the Bilderberg Steering Committee. Director of the Strategic Bombing Survey in London 1944 and 1945,. Collaborated with Jean Monnet and the French government in negotiations regarding the Marshall Plan. Helped draft the Schuman Plan and the European Coal and Steel Community Treaty. Endorsed 1963 coup which resulted in the death of South Vietnamese President Ngo Dinh Diem and his brother. US Ambassador to UN 1968. Under Secretary of State 1961-1966.]

The Kikes, Carter’s ZOG USA, the CIA, and UK ZOG helped set up the Islamic Republic of Iran because they wanted to stop Iran from becoming the regional superpower and threatening “Israel”, and wanted to wreck US-Iran relations.

Mohammed Reza Shah’s desire for military supremacy over his neighbors and his distrust of the Soviets led him to seek a military relationship with the United States.
This relationship eventually resulted in Iran wielding a military that was, on paper, within reach of becoming the world’s fifth-most-advanced force in 1978.
By the time Richard Nixon’s presidency began in January 1969, Iran was the USA’s single-largest arms purchaser.
By late 1972 Nixon leveraged U.S. Middle Eastern regional policy primarily around the focal point of a militarily strong, pro-American Iran.
The Shah was encouraged and empowered to begin a military spending spree in what is now known as the “blank check.”
In a few months in 1972, the Shah purchased over $3 billion dollars of arms from the United States—a twentyfold increase on the prior year.
For the remainder of the 1970s, the Shah continued to buy arms in the multibillions per annum, dwarfing all other U.S. allies such as Israel and NATO nations.
In the Shah, Washington had an ally who was willing to accept a position as a regional policeman and rich enough to afford to do so.
Iran secured a high-level alliance with its preferred side in the Cold War, a buffer against potential Soviet incursions from its northern border. It was a win-win scenario.
If the Shah had not been overthrown in 1979, it is likely that wider regional opposition, from Egypt to Turkey to the USSR to Saudi Arabia, would have manifested toput Iran down.
The Ford administration found itself the steward for an Iran-arms policy that was under threat from within the administration and from Congress. Congress continually battled with Ford for influence over military sales, with the weakening of Iran at the forefront of concerns.
Ford’s first secretary of defense, KIKE Jim Schlesinger, led a cabal in the administration opposed to the US relationship with Iran.
KIKE Schlesinger was the first US Secretary of Energy 1977–1979, Secretary of Defense 1973–1975, Director of Central Intelligence 1973.
Jimmy Carter won the Presidential election of 1976 partially on a popular platform of increased arms control and the introduction of human-rights considerations into U.S. foreign policy. In 1977, Carter was criticized for the US selling more arms to Iran than the United States had during any year prior.
Carter sought to moderate the Shah’s ambitions.
In 1978, the Iranian Ettelaat published an article accusing Khomeini of being a British agent. In response, the mullahs organized violent demonstrations.
The Shah and his regime were overthrown in the winter of 1978-1979.
The Ayatollah Khomeini returned from exile in France.
The Ayatollah was praised in the Western media as a democrat, a champion of human rights, and a man of peace.
The BBC Persian Service was so identified with pro-Khomeini propaganda that it was called “Ayatollah BBC” in Iran.
His deeply hostile anti-US Islamic theocracy took over in Iran, changing the name of the country to The Islamic Republic of Iran.
The largest deployment of U.S. arms in one single country fell into the hands of angry mobs shouting “death to America.”
The instability caused by the establishment of the Islamic Republic led to the direct application of U.S. power in the region—something that had been resisted for decades due to fears of imperial overreach and a reluctance to extend the definition of U.S. national interests to another theater.
When Saddam’s Iraq invaded the Islamic Republic, Iran was militarily propped up by “Israel” and the USA.

[KIKE] Schlesinger Confident U.S. Can Support Israel in War

By Drew Middleton, The New York Times, January 24, 1975, Page 1

Secretary of Defense James R. Schlesinger says that he is confident that the United States can provide the resources to sustain Israeli fighting forces should a fifth Middle East war begin.

American arms production is up, the Secretary said, partly because of the weaknesses displayed in defense industry when the Administration sought to resupply Israel with tanks and other major weapons after the war in October, 1973.

Responding to questions after a speech to the Economic Club of New York Wednesday night. Mr. Schlesinger, while conceding the high attrition rate of modern war, said he did not think a new conflict would last more than three weeks.

The Defense Secretary’s expression of confidence that supplies could be kept flowing to Israel in the event of another conflict follows the voicing of apprehension by the Israelis over the United States ability to keep them supplied while maintaining its own readiness.

Israeli military leaders are confident of the qualitative superiority of their first‐line weapons, but they are worried by the high toll exacted in 1973 by the “one shot, one hit” missile weapons provided to the Egyptian and Syrian Armies by the Soviet Union.

The Secretary also reaffirmed the military feasibility of intervention in Middle Eastern oil areas to prevent national economic strangulation — an idea advanced by Secretary of State Kissinger and reaffirmed by President Ford. He said that such action was “within the power” of the United States, describing his comment as “a statement of fact.”

His words, he cautioned, must not be taken as reflecting current American policy, for military action would be considered only in the gravest circumstances.

Israeli requests for weapons since 1973, which disclosed the American production deficiencies, also aroused concern in the services, particularly the Army, lest the outflow leave them without sufficient equipment to train the new professional force.

Since the 1973 war the United States has shipped 600 tanks [to Israel], many of them the most modern in the American arsenal, 56 F‐4 Phantom jets, sophisticated electronic equipment to protect warplanes against surfact‐to air missiles, advanced sensors, so‐called smart bombs, which seek targets, and thousands of tons of ammunition.

The Independent, 23 April 2010:

For Britain’s hard-pressed armaments industry, it was a lucrative deal with a trusted ally. Between 1971 and 1976, the increasingly despotic Shah of Iran had signed on the dotted line for 1,500 state-of-the-art Chieftain battle tanks and 250 repair vehicles costing £650 million. Even better, Persia’s King of Kings paid the British government for his new weaponry up front.

The problem came in 1979 when, with just 185 tanks delivered to Tehran, the Iranian Revolution deposed Shah Pahlavi and installed an Islamic Republic with a somewhat less warm stance towards the United Kingdom.

Britain is to pay back nearly £400m to Iran’s defence ministry after finally admitting defeat in the dispute in a move that will be heralded by Tehran as a major diplomatic triumph.

Leave a Reply Cancel reply