RAND PAUL SUBJECTED TO A TELEVISED MAOIST STRUGGLE-SESSION
2021.01.24 (video link below)
GEORGE STEPHANOPOULOS, ABC NEWS CHIEF ANCHOR (SENIOR ADVISOR TO PRESIDENT CLINTON, 1993-96, preceded by Kike Rahm Emanuel, and succeeded by Kike Sidney Blumenthal): Senator Paul, let me begin with a threshold question for you: This election was not stolen. Do you accept that fact?
SENATOR RAND PAUL, (R-KY): Well, what I would say is that the debate over whether or not there was fraud should occur, we never had any presentation in court where we actually looked at the evidence. Most of the cases were thrown out for lack of standing, which is a procedural way of not actually hearing the question.
There were several states in which the law was changed by the Secretary of State and not the state legislature. To me, those are clearly unconstitutional, and I think there’s still a chance that those actually do finally work their way up to the Supreme Court.
Courts traditionally and historically don’t like to hear election questions. But yes, were there people who voted twice? were there dead people who voted? were there illegal aliens who voted? Yes. And we should get to the bottom of it.
I’ll give you an example. In my state, when we had a Democrat Secretary of State, she refused, even under federal order, to purge the roles of illegal voters. We got a Republican Secretary of State and he purged the rules.
STEPHANOPOULOS: But Senator Paul, I have to —
PAUL: — difference and those things do have to —
STEPHANOPOULOS: I have to stop you there. No election is perfect. But there were 86 challenges filed by President Trump and his allies in court, all were dismissed. Every state certified the results —
PAUL: Chris, not for —
STEPHANOPOULOS: — after an investigation —
PAUL: Not for — but —
STEPHANOPOULOS: — count, after investigations —
PAUL: — of evidence. They were dismissed —
STEPHANOPOULOS: — counts and recounts.
PAUL: — for standing.
STEPHANOPOULOS: The Department of Justice led by William Barr said there’s no widespread evidence of fraud. Can’t you just say the words: “This election —
STEPHANOPOULOS: — was not stolen!”?
PAUL: Well, what I would suggest is — what I would suggest is that if we want greater confidence in our elections, and 75 percent of Republicans agree with me, is that we do need to look at election integrity, and we need to see if we can restore confidence in the elections.
STEPHANOPOULOS: Well, 75 percent of Republicans agree with you because they were fed a Big Lie by President Trump and his supporters, to say “the election was stolen.” Why can’t you say, “President Biden won a legitimate, fair election!”?
PAUL: I think where you make a mistake in — Hey, George, George, George — where you make a mistake is that people coming from the liberal side, like you, you immediately say, “everything’s a lie!”, instead of saying “there are two sides to everything.”
Historically, what would happen is if I said that I thought that there was fraud, you would interview someone else who said there wasn’t. But now you insert yourself in the middle and say that the absolute fact is that everything that I’m saying is a lie.
STEPHANOPOULOS: Well, because —
PAUL: — fact —
STEPHANOPOULOS: — Senator, I said what the president said was a lie because —
PAUL: — we’re going to.
STEPHANOPOULOS: Hold on a second. He said the election was stolen. This election was not stolen! The results were certified in every single state —
PAUL: You’re saying —
STEPHANOPOULOS: — after counts and recounts.
PAUL: — there was — you’re saying — you’re saying that absolutely it was — you’re saying there was no fraud and it’s all been investigated. And that’s just not true.
STEPHANOPOULOS: That’s not what I said, sir. I said the Department of Justice found no evidence —
PAUL: (Inaudible) —
STEPHANOPOULOS: Let me finish my point.
PAUL: But you say it’s all lies —
STEPHANOPOULOS: You said something that was not true.
PAUL: You say we’re all liars. You just simply say we’re all liars and that you’re right and we’re wrong.
Well, let — no. Let’s talk about the specifics of it.
In Wisconsin, tens of thousands of absentee votes had only the name on them and no address. Historically, those were thrown out, this time they weren’t. They made special accommodations, because they said, “oh, it’s a pandemic and people forgot what their address was.”
So they changed the law, after the fact. That is wrong. That’s unconstitutional. And I plan on spending the next two years going around state to state and fixing these problems, and I won’t be cowed by liberals in the media who say, “there’s no evidence here, and you’re a liar if you talk about election fraud!”
No, let’s have an open debate. It’s a free country.
STEPHANOPOULOS: There is no widespread evidence of election fraud that overturned that results. That was stated as well by the Department of Justice led by President Trump’s attorney general.
In Wisconsin, there were counts and recounts —
PAUL: It was never studied. Even that’s not true. Even that’s not true. Even that’s not true.
STEPHANOPOULOS: William Barr said that directly.
PAUL: Barr said that, but there was — yes, he said that, yes. That was a pronouncement.
There’s been no examination, thorough examination, of all the states, to see what problems we had, and see if they could fix them.
Now, let me say, to be clear: I voted to certify the state electors, because I think it would be wrong for Congress to overturn that.
But at the same time, I’m not willing just to sit here and say, “oh, everybody on the Republican side is a liar, and there is no fraud.” No, there were lots of problems, and there were secretaries of state who illegally changed the law, and that needs to be fixed.
And I’m going to work hard to fix it. And I won’t be cowed by people saying, “oh, you’re a liar!”
That’s the problem with the media today, is they say all Republicans are liars, and everything we say is a lie. There are two sides to every story. Interview somebody on the other side, but don’t insert yourself into the story to say we’re all liars because we do think there’s some fraud and the election needs to be fixed.
STEPHANOPOULOS: Sir, there are not — there are not two sides to this story! This has been looked in every single state!
PAUL: Sure there are. There are two sides to every story. George, you’re forgetting who you are. You’re forgetting who you are as a journalist, if you think there’s only one side.
You’re inserting yourself into the story to say I’m a liar because I want to look at election fraud and I want to look at secretaries of state who illegally changed the voter laws without the permission of their state legislatures. That is incontrovertible, it happened.
And you can’t just sweep it under the rug and say, “oh, nothing to see here!” and, “everybody is a liar!”, and, “you’re a fool if you bring this up!” You’re inserting yourself into the story. A journalist would hear both sides, and there are two sides of a story.
STEPHANOPOULOS: I’m standing — I’m standing by facts! There are not two sides to facts! I did not say this was a perfect election. I say the results were certified. I said it was not stolen! It is a lie —
PAUL: You’re saying people are liars. You’re saying people are liars if they want to investigate what happened in the election.
STEPHANOPOULOS: That’s not what I said!
PAUL: Should we investigate the fact that tens of thousands of absentee ballots did not have addresses on them, and normally were disqualified, but this time they were counted? Should we examine that?
I don’t know whether it affected the election or not, but I have an open mind. And if we actually examine this, and we find out it didn’t, that’s fine. But it still should be fixed.
STEPHANOPOULOS: There can be more investigations. The investigations that have taken place have shown there’s not enough fraud to change the results of this election. That has been certified by every state! It was stated by the Justice Department and the attorney general!
PAUL: And I accepted the states’ certifications. But it doesn’t mean that I think there wasn’t fraud, and that there weren’t problems that have to be investigated. And it doesn’t mean that the law wasn’t broken.
I believe in Pennsylvania, they broke the law, and I believe if that ever will get a real hearing in the Supreme Court — it was denied for standing. It wasn’t actually taken up. If it were taken up, I do believe that the Supreme Court would overrule, and say that they did break the law, illegally.
STEPHANOPOULOS: I asked you a very simple question: Was the election stolen or not?
[FALSE. Stephanopoulos actually began by saying: “Senator Paul, let me begin with a threshold question for you: This election was not stolen. Do you accept that fact?”]
PAUL: I think there was great deal of evidence of fraud and changing of the election laws illegally. And I think a thorough investigation is warranted.